Mies van der Rohe: The Brick Country House/According to Plan

We know Mies van der Rohe’s project the Brick Country House, 1924, only through photographs of a perspective drawing and a ground floor plan, often paired together, and a few other drawings based on them that followed. Despite appearances they don’t align and the perspective drawing is based on a substantially different plan than the one given, as I explain in Mies van der Rohe: Meditations on a Plan. There I argue both, despite their differences, are complete and compelling in their own ways, providing two different takes of what Mies might have had in mind. In Mies van der Rohe: The Brick Country House Revisited/Revised I attempted a model that matched the perspective drawing, using a revised plan I guessed at.

Here I attempt one that sticks to the original plan. And I think I will finally give my project a rest. It has perplexed me for years, as it has others, and I can’t go further. Some problems—many?—most?—are better left open, unresolved.

Continue reading

Mies van der Rohe: The Brick Country House Revisited/Revised

I have long wondered what Mies van der Rohe’s Brick Country House might look like in actual three dimensions, wanting to make a model I could walk around and view from all angles, then see where that took me.

It exists only as a perspective drawing

and a ground floor plan, both made a century ago, both often presented together, both of which tell us little about the second floor, beyond what we see.

I thought if I analyzed the plan carefully enough, long enough, I might come up with an inspiration that would provide a central concept that, once applied, would reveal the structure of the rest, unseen. I discovered the opposite, that there is no central concept. Rather the design, as much of it as we are given, depends upon being active and unpredictable. Order is a point of departure. I also studied his other houses of the time to get ideas—the Concrete Country House, the Dexel House, the Eliat House, the Krefeld Villas, the Tugendhat House, still more, all in varying degrees of completion and conception—all of them similar only in how different they all are. Mies is experimenting with different sites, different programs, different ideas. The only conclusion I could make is that the closer he came to a final, built version, the more compromises he had to make. That is not a problem with this house, which was never built. Mies had complete freedom.

Continue reading

Mies van der Rohe: Meditations on a Plan

Mies conceived of building as arising out of a field of tension that consisted of intrinsic lawfulness on one hand and creative freedom on the other. It should afford the “required privacy combined with the freedom of open room forms” and provide a “defining” but not a “confining space” suitable for contemporary living. Behind this concept of space and architecture that defined “building” in a philosophical sense as a “giving form to reality” stood for Mies the question of the “value and dignity of human existence,” namely: “Is the world as it presents itself bearable for man? . . . . Can it be shaped so as to be worthwhile to live in?”

Neumeyer

For decades I have been moved by Mies van der Rohe’s Brick Country House without knowing why. Not knowing why may be a large part of the attraction, along with a sense of release when I look again at the drawings, also without knowing why, or where, but without feeling I have left the ground. But it is open and direct about what it is, factual, honest, as Mies would have it. This honesty may be its greatest strength, its largest mystery.

Continue reading

Mies van der Rohe: The Brick Villa

1

For Mies, architecture was neither a technical problem nor applied sociology but rather, as he wrote in 1928, using words that are as ambiguous as they are emphatic, “the spatial implementation of intellectual decisions.”

—Christoph Asendorf, “Ludwig Mies van der Rohe—Dessau, Berlin, Chicago”

The full essay, “Completing the Mies van der Rohe Brick Country House, An Odyssey” can be found at Numéro Cinq here. It is a literary essay that I hope adds some extension and insight. It looks back to the Greeks and forward to recent architecture, adding reflections on Modernism and raising questions about current work along the way.

This is my first attempt. Pictures of the model can be found after the break. For more recent models, go here.

Continue reading